Investigates aeration intensity impacts on treatment performance and membrane fouling in a bioreactor, suggesting optimized pollutant removal and energy efficiency.
This study investigates the performance of a sequencing batch electro-membrane bioreactor (SB-EMBR) operated under low electric charge loading (39.9 mAh L⁻ 1 ), focusing on the effects of aeration intensity on treatment performance, biomass activity, and membrane fouling. The reactor was operated at a current density of 10 A m −2 and three specific aeration demand levels (SADₘ = 0.48, 0.24, and 0.12 m 3 m⁻ 2 h⁻ 1 ). Organic matter and phosphorus removals remained consistently high (> 90% COD removal; TP < 1.0 mg L⁻ 1 ) regardless of aeration intensity. In contrast, ammonium removal efficiency declined from 99.5 to 74.7% as the SADₘ decreased from 0.48 to 0.12 m 3 m⁻ 2 h⁻ 1 . Batch assays revealed reduced activity of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms under oxygen-limited conditions. The pronounced decrease in the P-release/COD-uptake ratio from 0.172 to 0.0164 mol P mol⁻ 1 C indicates that TP removal at low dissolved oxygen became predominantly governed by chemical coagulation rather than the biological phosphorus removal process. The calculated Al/P molar ratio of 2.32 mol Al mol⁻ 1 P was sufficient to sustain phosphorus removal through both precipitation and adsorption onto aluminum hydroxides. Reduced aeration favored anoxic phosphorus uptake, increasing the denitrifying phosphate assimilation potential from 18 to 41%. The membrane fouling rate increased from 1.02 to 4.81 kPa d⁻ 1 as aeration decreased, mainly due to diminished shear forces, soluble microbial products accumulation (+ 205%), floc size reduction (− 50.1%), and higher capillary suction time (+ 123%). Owing to the short current application (1.6 h d⁻ 1 ), the additional electrocoagulation cost was only 0.07 USD m⁻ 3 , lower than values reported for continuous-flow EMBRs. Overall, operation of the SB-EMBR under reduced electric charge loading demonstrated promising energy efficiency while maintaining stable and satisfactory pollutant removal even at low aeration intensities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: