Critiques AI research by exploring how large language models challenge human exceptionalism, indicating social implications.
This paper develops a Wittgensteinian critique of the humanist prior in contemporary AI research. It argues that large language models challenge human exceptionalism not by proving machine consciousness, but by entering the public language-world through which understanding, authority, trust, and self-description are socially recognized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chin-chi Chang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: