Evaluates trajectory tracking and sloshing suppression in tanker robots, suggesting enhanced control robustness.
This paper proposes a hybrid SMC + ESO + RBF control architecture designed to evaluate trajectory tracking and liquid sloshing suppression in tanker robots navigating complex terrains within a simulated environment. A multi-variable dynamic model integrates the differential drive mobile platform with an equivalent mass-spring-damper sloshing system under terrain disturbances. To achieve robust stability, an Extended State Observer (ESO) neutralizes baseline generalized disturbances, while a Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network adaptively compensates for residual nonlinear coupled sloshing errors. Practical stability and uniform ultimate boundedness (UUB) of the closed-loop system are proven via Lyapunov theory under bounded network approximation errors and observer uncertainties. Numerical simulations in MATLAB/Simulink demonstrate that the proposed controller achieves a baseline Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.0109 m, representing an 84.1% improvement over traditional Sliding Mode Control (SMC). Parametric sensitivity analysis under variable liquid filling ratios (30%, 50%, and 70%) and a circular steering topology indicates notable adaptability, with the tracking RMSE bounded between 0.0085 m and 0.0129 m under the considered virtual scenarios. Within the simulated environment, the system successfully smooths control profiles and dampens liquid oscillations, demonstrating a promising potential to support transport safety and mitigate actuator chattering under virtual constraints. However, these qualitative observations serve as preliminary hypotheses and must be formally verified through future hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) experiments to evaluate the impact of physical non-idealities, including sensor noise, actuator saturation, communication delays, and wheel slip. These findings confirm the competitive analytical robustness of the SMC + ESO + RBF framework in stabilizing tanker robots within highly uncertain simulated operational environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiep et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: