Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates groundwater level estimation in dune field lakes, indicating effective use of satellite altimetry.
Groundwater levels are usually mapped as water table contours produced from point data, that is, hydraulic heads measured in modest numbers of observation wells distributed across a given region. The typically sparse distributions of wells, especially in remote areas, severely limit the number of observations that can be made and may lead to ambiguous groundwater-level estimates at unsampled locations. Satellite altimetry provides reliable estimates of hydraulic heads wherever surface water and groundwater intersect, regardless of how remote the location is. Therefore, we tested the use of Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite 2 (ICESat-2) and Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) measurements of water levels in interdune water table lakes to characterize groundwater levels in the Nebraska Sandhills (central USA), the largest dune field in the Western Hemisphere. Our satellite altimetry estimates of groundwater levels in the Nebraska Sandhills closely approximate the measurements made in nearby observation wells. ICESat-2 showed a root-mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.68 m with ± 0.45 m standard deviation (SD). SWOT estimated an RMSE of 0.75 m with ± 0.76 m SD. Monthly groundwater levels were estimated using kriging with an external drift and generalized additive models, with RMSEs ranging from 1.9 m to 3.3 m and with unbiased errors (mean error of −0.003 m to 0.153 m). We conclude that satellite altimetry has potential for the remote measurements of groundwater levels under certain geographic conditions, especially where groundwater-dominated lakes are prevalent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shrestha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: