Analyzes nerve transfers' effectiveness in reducing complications from brachial plexus injuries, indicating a shift in surgical practice.
Background: Nerve transfers have been heralded as a “quantum leap” in peripheral nerve surgery, fundamentally altering the reconstructive paradigm over the past 2 decades. This study analyzed national trends in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) management, tracking specialty-specific adoption of nerve transfers and comparing 30-day postoperative outcomes with traditional reconstruction. Methods: Data were extracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2006 to 2022). Adult patients (18 years or older) with a primary BPI diagnosis, who underwent nerve reconstruction, were included. Cases were categorized by the presence of a nerve transfer using CPT code 64905. Analyses included descriptive statistics, standardized mean differences, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 544 BPI patients, 80 underwent reconstruction involving a nerve transfer. Plastic surgeons performed 60% of nerve transfers despite accounting for only 33.5% of all BPI reconstructions. Neurosurgeons had the lowest overall nerve transfer utilization but increased to a rate matching orthopedic surgeons in the final 4 years. Nerve transfers were associated with lower 30-day complication rates than traditional reconstruction (2.5% vs. 11%, P =0.034), despite being performed on patients with higher preoperative morbidity risk. In multivariable analysis, orthopedic and neurosurgeons remained significantly less likely than plastic surgeons to perform nerve transfers (OR: 0.26, P <0.001; OR: 0.18, P <0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Nerve transfer use in BPI reconstruction has increased steadily, with a recent increase among neurosurgeons. Despite being used in higher-risk patients, nerve transfers were associated with significantly lower short-term complication rates. These findings support continued adoption of nerve transfers and highlight their favorable safety profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhupati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: