Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a diagnostic framework for technology adoption in agriculture, suggesting improved decision-making for farmers.
Farmers lack systematic methods to assess digital technology suitability for their specific contexts, with prospective indicators for technology–farm fit scarce in literature. This paper presents a diagnostic framework assessing adoption feasibility across three empirically grounded dimensions: context matching, infrastructure readiness, and farmer capability/economic viability. The framework was developed via bibliometric analysis (814 publications, 2014-2023, with 20 in-depth case studies), benchmarking ten existing indices, and expert validation (22 specialists assigning importance weights 1-5, consolidated by modal value). As proof-of-concept, two developer/adopter instruments were applied to contrasting Embrapa technologies: Aquicultura Certa (AI-based software) and an electronic fruit-harvest tracking device (hardware). The software scored 3 (moderate feasibility) due to electricity, connectivity, and training needs, while the hardware scored 4 (high feasibility) due to simpler prerequisites. Developer and adopter assessments converged for hardware but moderately diverged for software, illustrating perspective-specific barriers. These pilots demonstrate internal logic and usability but do not constitute predictive validation; broader applicability requires multi-technology, independent, and longitudinal testing. The framework enables extension services to match technologies to producers, developers to refine solutions for resource-limited settings, and policymakers to target infrastructure investments, bridging the gap between technological availability and appropriate adoption to support evidence-based decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dibbern et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: