Compares socket healing following third-molar extraction with H-PRF and L-PRF, suggesting H-PRF may enhance bone structure.
Objectives: To compare horizontal platelet-rich fibrin (H-PRF) and leukocyte-rich PRF (L-PRF) with no-PRF on long-term socket bone structure and periodontal parameters 12–18 months after impacted mandibular third-molar extraction. Materials and Methods: This retrospective follow-up analyzed a previously randomized three-arm clinical cohort (n=45; 15 per group). Panoramic radiographs obtained 12–18 months post-extraction were assessed by fractal analysis at the extraction site. Periodontal probing depths at six sites around the adjacent second molar and buccal keratinized tissue width were recorded with a UNC-15 probe. Group differences were evaluated at α=0.05. Results: Mean fractal dimension (FD) differed among groups (H-PRF 1.32±0.05; L-PRF 1.28±0.04; Control 1.26±0.06; overall p=0.005). H-PRF showed higher FD than Control (mean difference 0.062; 95% CI 0.018–0.105; p=0.004), whereas H-PRF vs L-PRF was not significant (p=0.101) and L-PRF vs Control was not significant (p=0.396). Keratinized tissue width tended to be greater with H-PRF (1.70±1.10 mm) than Control (0.84±1.00 mm) without significance (p=0.093). Site-specific probing depths showed no between-group differences (lowest p=0.051). Intra-examiner reliability for measures was good-to-excellent (ICC=0.895; p<0.001). Conclusion: At 12–18 months, H-PRF yielded a higher socket FD than no-PRF, while differences versus L-PRF were not significant. Periodontal indices at the adjacent second molar were broadly comparable across groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuzu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: