PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 3, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology247 citations

Prognostic and Bioepidemiologic Implications of Papillary Fibroelastomas

View Full Paper
STSyahidah Syed TaminJMJoseph J. MaleszewskiCSChristopher G. Scott

Key Result

Surgical removal of papillary fibroelastomas was associated with a lower 5-year risk of cerebrovascular accident (8%) compared to echocardiographically suspected but unoperated tumors (13%).

Key Points

  • This research aims to describe the frequency and clinical outcomes associated with papillary fibroelastomas (PFE) in patients with and without surgical intervention.
  • Query of Mayo Clinic pathology and echocardiography databases (1995-2010) resulting in 511 patients: 185 surgically removed PFEs and 326 echocardiographically confirmed PFEs without surgery.
  • Grouping of patients into those with surgically removed PFEs and those with suspected PFE based on echocardiograms.
  • In group 1, 32% of patients experienced transient ischemic attack or stroke, with 1.6% recurrence of PFE post-surgery.
  • Follow-up stroke risk at 1 year: group 1 (2%), group 1a (0%), and group 1b (4%); at 5 years: 8%, 5%, and 11% respectively.
  • Group 2 had a cerebrovascular accident risk of 6% at 1 year and 13% at 5 years.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=511)

PICO

P
Population
511 patients with surgically removed or echocardiographically suspected papillary fibroelastomas, followed for up to 5 years to assess the risk of cerebrovascular accident and mortality.
E
Exposure / Comparator
Surgical removal of papillary fibroelastoma vs Echocardiographically suspected, unoperated papillary fibroelastoma
O
Primary Outcome
Cerebrovascular accident at 5 years

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 13%

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Papillary fibroelastomas (PFE) are benign neoplasms with little available outcome data. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the frequency and clinical course of patients with surgically removed PFE and echocardiographically suspected, but unoperated, PFE. METHODS: Mayo Clinic pathology and echocardiography databases (January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2010) were queried, resulting in 511 patients: group 1 (n = 185), including patients with surgically removed, histopathologically confirmed PFE; group 1a (n = 94; 51%) with PFE removed at primary surgery; and group 1b (n = 91; 49%) with PFE removal at time of another cardiac surgery. Group 2 (n = 326) patients had echocardiographic evidence of PFE but no cardiac surgery to remove PFE. RESULTS: Group 1 had mean age of 63 ± 14 years (116 women 63%). During the study period, we identified 112 cardiac myxomas in the pathology database and 142 in the echocardiographic database. Mean age in group 2 was 67 ± 14 years (162 women 50%). PFE occurred most commonly on cardiac valves (n = 400 78%). In group 1, transient ischemic attack or stroke was the presenting symptom in 58 patients (32%). With surgical removal of valvular PFE, the valve was preserved in 92 (98%). Recurrence was documented in 3 patients (1.6%). Follow-up stroke risk in groups 1, 1a, and 1b at 1 year was 2%, 0%, and 4%; at 5 years, 8%, 5%, and 11%, respectively. Cerebrovascular accident risk in group 2 at 1 and 5 years was 6% and 13%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with echocardiographically suspected PFE who do not undergo surgical removal, rates of cerebrovascular accident and mortality are increased.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tamin et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Papillary fibroelastomas (n=511). Surgical removal of papillary fibroelastoma vs. Echocardiographically suspected, unoperated papillary fibroelastoma was evaluated on Cerebrovascular accident at 5 years. Surgical removal of papillary fibroelastomas was associated with a lower 5-year risk of cerebrovascular accident (8%) compared to echocardiographically suspected but unoperated tumors (13%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a477e941565054dbe92d0f9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper