PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
This research is Trending!
July 3, 2026Stroke0 citations

Management of Patients at Risk of Ischemic Stroke With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in the Absence of Intracardiac Thrombus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

View Full Paper
RSRicha SharmaGLGlenn N. LevineSSSarah A. Spinler

Key Result

Anticoagulation may lower recurrent stroke risk compared with antiplatelet therapy in patients with stroke and LV dysfunction without thrombus, despite no net benefit for primary prevention.

Key Points

  • This statement aims to evaluate the impact of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on stroke risk and the role of anticoagulation in its management.
  • Narrative summary of existing evidence on LV dysfunction and stroke risk.
  • Meta-analysis of secondary outcomes from randomized clinical trials comparing anticoagulation and nonanticoagulation strategies.
  • Recommendations for clinical decision-making involving cardiology and neurology collaboration.
  • Anticoagulation shows a lower risk of incident stroke in patients with LV dysfunction without thrombus.
  • No net benefit of anticoagulation over nonanticoagulation strategies for primary stroke prevention.
  • Anticoagulation may lower the risk of recurrent stroke compared to antiplatelet therapy in patients with prior stroke and LV dysfunction.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis

Structured PICO

Does anticoagulation reduce the risk of incident and recurrent stroke in patients with LV systolic dysfunction without intracardiac thrombus compared to nonanticoagulation strategies?

P
Population
Patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (reduced LV ejection fraction ≤40% or left wall motion abnormality) without intracardiac thrombus, at risk of incident or recurrent ischemic stroke
I
Intervention
Anticoagulation
C
Comparator
Nonanticoagulation strategies (e.g., antiplatelet therapy)
O
Outcome
Incident and recurrent strokehard clinical

In patients with LV systolic dysfunction without intracardiac thrombus, anticoagulation may offer a net benefit for secondary stroke prevention compared to antiplatelet therapy, but lacks net benefit for primary prevention.

Limitations

  • Data supporting anticoagulation in these patients are limited

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, defined here as reduced LV ejection fraction ≤40% or left wall motion abnormality, is commonly found in patients with ischemic stroke. Although there is an increased risk of incident and recurrent embolic stroke among patients with LV dysfunction without thrombus detected, the data supporting anticoagulation in these patients are limited. In this scientific statement, we summarize the latest evidence regarding the risk of incident and recurrent stroke in patients with LV dysfunction as well as best practice recommendations regarding the management of this population after stroke. We provide a narrative summary and meta-analysis of secondary analyses of randomized clinical trials that evaluated outcomes following anticoagulation versus nonanticoagulation strategies. Whereas anticoagulation is associated with a lower risk of incident stroke in patients with LV dysfunction without thrombus, there remains no net benefit of this strategy over a nonanticoagulant strategy for primary stroke prevention. For patients with stroke and LV dysfunction, anticoagulation may be associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke and a net benefit when compared with antiplatelet therapy. Anticoagulation treatment decisions in these patients may involve individualized consideration, shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals upon discussing risks and benefits, and multidisciplinary collaboration between cardiology and neurology clinicians to optimize cardiac and brain health. As a key modifiable stroke risk factor and therapeutic target, LV dysfunction represents a target for future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper
Trending Research#3 this week

This new AHA scientific statement addresses a common clinical dilemma, suggesting individualized decision-making for anticoagulation in secondary stroke prevention for patients with LV dysfunction.

Social attention
80
Preprint velocity
0
News coverage
85
Conference
0
Expert commentary
0

Cite This Study

Sharma et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Ischemic stroke with left ventricular systolic dysfunction without intracardiac thrombus. Anticoagulation vs. Nonanticoagulation strategies (antiplatelet therapy) was evaluated on Incident and recurrent stroke. Anticoagulation may lower recurrent stroke risk compared with antiplatelet therapy in patients with stroke and LV dysfunction without thrombus, despite no net benefit for primary prevention.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a48276c279027ce2e29a6d5https://doi.org/10.1161/str.0000000000000528
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Anticoagulation in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Sinus Rhythm2013 · 6 citations
  2. 2Evolving Strategies in the Detection and Management of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Clinical Summary2025
  3. 3Contemporary review of the management of left ventricular thrombus2023 · 2 citations
  4. 4Left Ventricular Thrombus Despite Prescribed Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Case Report and Review of Risk Stratification2026
  5. 5Left ventricular disease as a risk factor for adverse outcomes and stroke recurrence in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source2025 · 4 citations