Anticoagulation may lower recurrent stroke risk compared with antiplatelet therapy in patients with stroke and LV dysfunction without thrombus, despite no net benefit for primary prevention.
Meta-Analysis
Does anticoagulation reduce the risk of incident and recurrent stroke in patients with LV systolic dysfunction without intracardiac thrombus compared to nonanticoagulation strategies?
In patients with LV systolic dysfunction without intracardiac thrombus, anticoagulation may offer a net benefit for secondary stroke prevention compared to antiplatelet therapy, but lacks net benefit for primary prevention.
Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, defined here as reduced LV ejection fraction ≤40% or left wall motion abnormality, is commonly found in patients with ischemic stroke. Although there is an increased risk of incident and recurrent embolic stroke among patients with LV dysfunction without thrombus detected, the data supporting anticoagulation in these patients are limited. In this scientific statement, we summarize the latest evidence regarding the risk of incident and recurrent stroke in patients with LV dysfunction as well as best practice recommendations regarding the management of this population after stroke. We provide a narrative summary and meta-analysis of secondary analyses of randomized clinical trials that evaluated outcomes following anticoagulation versus nonanticoagulation strategies. Whereas anticoagulation is associated with a lower risk of incident stroke in patients with LV dysfunction without thrombus, there remains no net benefit of this strategy over a nonanticoagulant strategy for primary stroke prevention. For patients with stroke and LV dysfunction, anticoagulation may be associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke and a net benefit when compared with antiplatelet therapy. Anticoagulation treatment decisions in these patients may involve individualized consideration, shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals upon discussing risks and benefits, and multidisciplinary collaboration between cardiology and neurology clinicians to optimize cardiac and brain health. As a key modifiable stroke risk factor and therapeutic target, LV dysfunction represents a target for future research.
This new AHA scientific statement addresses a common clinical dilemma, suggesting individualized decision-making for anticoagulation in secondary stroke prevention for patients with LV dysfunction.
Sharma et al. (Thu,) conducted a meta-analysis in Ischemic stroke with left ventricular systolic dysfunction without intracardiac thrombus. Anticoagulation vs. Nonanticoagulation strategies (antiplatelet therapy) was evaluated on Incident and recurrent stroke. Anticoagulation may lower recurrent stroke risk compared with antiplatelet therapy in patients with stroke and LV dysfunction without thrombus, despite no net benefit for primary prevention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: