Key result
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons scoring system demonstrated good discrimination for predicting postoperative mortality (AUC 0.76) and major morbidity (AUC 0.75) following isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in a Brazilian population.
Why the study?
Does the STS scoring system accurately predict postoperative mortality and morbidity in a Brazilian population undergoing isolated CABG?
Observational (n=659)
No
Does the STS scoring system accurately predict postoperative mortality and morbidity in a Brazilian population undergoing isolated CABG?
The STS scoring system provides good calibration and discrimination for predicting postoperative mortality and major morbidity in Brazilian patients undergoing isolated CABG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
STS score appears suitable for Brazilian CABG risk assessment; extends validation to this population but leaves broader applicability open.
OBJECTIVE: Report the experience with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons scoring system in a Brazilian population submitted to isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS: Data were collected from January-2010 to December-2011, and analyzed to determine the performance of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons scoring system on the determination of postoperative mortality and morbidity, using the method of the receiver operating characteristic curve as well as the Hosmer-Lemeshow and the Chi-square goodness of fit tests. From the 1083 cardiac surgeries performed during the study period 659 represented coronary artery bypass graft procedures which are included in the present analysis. Mean age was 61.4 years and 77% were men. RESULTS: Goodness of fit tests have shown good calibration indexes both for mortality (X2=6.78, P=0.56) and general morbidity (X2=6.69, P=0.57). Analysis of area under the ROC-curve (AUC) demonstrated a good performance to detect the risk of death (AUC 0.76; P<0.001), renal failure (AUC 0.79; P<0.001), prolonged ventilation (AUC 0.80; P<0.001), reoperation (AUC 0.76; P<0.001) and major morbidity (AUC 0.75; P<0.001) which represents the combination of the assessed postoperative complications. STS scoring system did not present comparable results for short term hospital stay, prolonged length of hospital stay and could not be properly tested for stroke and wound infection. CONCLUSION: Society of Thoracic Surgeons scoring system presented a good calibration and discrimination in our population to predict postoperative mortality and the majority of the harmful events following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Analysis of larger samples might be needed to further validate the use of the score system in Brazilian populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikeoka et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=659). Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) scoring system vs. Observed outcomes was evaluated on Discrimination for postoperative mortality (AUC 0.76, p=<0.001). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons scoring system demonstrated good discrimination for predicting postoperative mortality (AUC 0.76) and major morbidity (AUC 0.75) following isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in a Brazilian population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: