Key result
Administration of 12 mg adenosine failed to induce transient VA block in 40% (50/124) of patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, showing high variability in retrograde fast pathway sensitivity.
Why the study?
Does 12 mg adenosine reliably induce transient ventriculoatrial block in the retrograde fast pathway in patients with inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia?
Observational (n=124)
Does 12 mg adenosine reliably induce transient ventriculoatrial block in the retrograde fast pathway in patients with inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia?
A lack of ventriculoatrial block after adenosine injection is not specific for persistent accessory pathway function after radiofrequency ablation, as 40% of patients exhibit retrograde fast pathways insensitive to adenosine.
Adenosine testing for concealed accessory pathway ablation may yield false negatives from variable retrograde fast pathway response; leaves open need for prospective validation of alternative endpoints.
BACKGROUND: Adenosine is widely used as a tool to assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of concealed accessory pathways. HYPOTHESIS: The goal of this study was to determine the reliability of this test by studying the retrograde fast pathway sensibility in a large patient population with typical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry tachycardias. We sought also to determine whether AV nodal properties were predictive of a retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine. METHODS: In all, 124 patients with inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included in this study. All patients received a clinically used standard dose of 12 mg adenosine during ventricular pacing, with 500 ms and a constant ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction via the fast pathway. Electrophysiologic parameters of the AV node were determined in all patients in order to correlate them with the adenosine sensitivity of the retrograde pathway. RESULTS: In 74 patients, the injection of 12 mg adenosine resulted in a transient VA block, whereas no VA block occurred in the remaining 50 patients. In two patients, concealed accessory pathways were unmasked after the injection of adenosine. The adenosine sensitivity of the retrograde fast pathway was associated with longer retrograde conduction times and cycle lengths during AV nodal reentrant tachycardias. CONCLUSION: This study shows a high variability of retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine. Thus, in 40% of patients the lack of VA block after adenosine injection is not specific for persistent accessory pathway function after radiofrequency ablation. Electrophysiologic properties of patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardias were different in patients with and without adenosine-sensitive retrograde fast pathways, possibly indicating differential patterns of penetration of the retrograde fast pathway into the compact AV node.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mewis et al. (2000) conducted an observational in typical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry tachycardias (n=124). Adenosine was evaluated on transient VA block. Administration of 12 mg adenosine failed to induce transient VA block in 40% (50/124) of patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, showing high variability in retrograde fast pathway sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: