Key result
Apixaban is linked to ~31% lower bleeding risk vs. rivaroxaban in AF and VTE.
Why the study?
Randomized trials directly comparing bleeding risk between apixaban and rivaroxaban in VTE and AF were ongoing, motivating a trial emulation using claims data to predict their findings.
Does apixaban reduce the risk of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban in patients with venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=382,026)
Does apixaban reduce the risk of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban in patients with venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.69 (95% CI 0.66–0.71)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.4% vs 9.2%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 2.8%
A target trial emulation using US claims data successfully predicted the results of the COBRRA-VTE trial and highlights that apixaban carries a significantly lower bleeding risk than rivaroxaban in real-world practice.
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, have transformed the management of thromboembolic disorders. Randomized controlled trials were initiated in 2017 (COBRRA-VTE [Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism]) and 2021 (COBRRA-AF [Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation]) to directly compare apixaban and rivaroxaban on the risk of bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to emulate the design and measurements of these ongoing trials and use US health care insurance claims data to predict their findings. METHODS: In cohort studies designed to emulate COBRRA-VTE (REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05264168) and COBRRA-AF (NCT05256797) in 3 US health care insurance claims databases (Medicare, Optum Clinformatics, Merative MarketScan), the risk of bleeding with apixaban was evaluated relative to the risk with rivaroxaban. Pretreatment confounding factors were adjusted for via 1:1 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was a composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (defined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision diagnosis codes) recorded in the inpatient setting. Results across databases were pooled using fixed-effects meta-analyses. Protocols were preregistered on ClinicalTrials.gov before inferential analyses were conducted. RESULTS: In the COBRRA-VTE emulation (N=14 023 matched pairs, mean age=67 years, 55% women), we observed a 31% decreased risk of bleeding for apixaban compared with rivaroxaban (incidence rate per 100 person-years: apixaban, 12.8; rivaroxaban, 19.1; hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59–0.79]). For the COBRRA-AF emulation (N=176 990 matched pairs, mean age=74 years, 50% women), we similarly observed a 31% decreased risk for apixaban compared with rivaroxaban (incidence rate per 100 person-years: apixaban, 6.4; rivaroxaban, 9.2; hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.66–0.71]). CONCLUSIONS: In database studies that closely emulated the design and measurements of the COBRRA-VTE and COBRRA-AF trials, a substantially lower risk of bleeding with apixaban was observed, consistent with the results of COBRRA-VTE (published after completion of our analyses), and indirect comparisons from other trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahesri et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism and Atrial Fibrillation (n=382,026). Apixaban vs. Rivaroxaban was evaluated on Composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding recorded in the inpatient setting (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66-0.71). Apixaban exposure was associated with a 31% decreased risk of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban in both matched cohorts of patients with VTE (HR 0.69) and AF (HR 0.69).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: