Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how social norms affect narrative enjoyment in various story endings, suggesting significant shifts in audience appraisal.
What affects the appeal of media consumed in the presence of other people: the story resolution, others’ opinions, or both? Two studies leveraged the narrative enjoyment and appreciation rationale (NEAR) to demonstrate how social norm cues reinforce or conflict with content cues to influence narrative appraisals. Participants read stories with positive, mixed, or negative endings accompanied by norm cues that indicated others’ opinions. Among positive endings, reinforcing social cues (e.g. others’ liking of positive endings) increased intuitive enjoyment of the narrative, whereas conflicting social cues (e.g. others’ disliking of positive endings) elicited slower evaluations and less enjoyment. These effects were reversed among negative endings: Reinforcing cues promoted disliking and conflicting cues increased liking. When endings were mixed, appraisals aligned with others’ opinions. This study informs our understanding of how we consume media in social contexts, and what influence others’ opinions have on our own appreciation for stories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kryston et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: