Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates remedial actions to optimize decontamination for nuclear infrastructure reuse, suggesting economic benefits.
After nuclear power plant decommissioning, remediation is required to ensure that radiation doses from residual radioactivity in remaining buildings do not exceed 0.1 mSv/y, and decontamination below this legal criterion may be considered from the ALARA perspective. Accordingly, this study conducted an ALARA evaluation of remedial actions for the reuse of remaining buildings at Kori Unit 1 to determine the need for additional remediation and to identify the optimal remedial action. Evaluation factors were identified based on the ALARA Action Level methodology of NUREG-1757 and analyses of U.S. License Termination Plans (LTPs) and were redefined to reflect site-specific characteristics. Cost factors were derived for selected remedial actions, ALARA Action Levels were calculated, and the impact of the level of decontamination was analyzed.The results showed that all remedial actions yielded ALARA Action Levels greater than unity, indicating that decontamination below the DCGL is unnecessary. Shaving exhibited the lowest ALARA Action Level and was identified as the remedial action closest to satisfying the ALARA principle. These results are expected to support ALARA-based planning of remediation activities following nuclear power plant decommissioning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: