Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates accuracy and confidence of AI models in endodontics, indicating the need for reliability assessments.
Background:This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy, confidence, and overconfidence behavior of large language models (LLMs) in endodontics using questions derived from a national specialty entrance examination. Material/Methods:A total of 123 text-based endodontic questions from the Turkish Dental Specialty Examination (2017-2026) were included after excluding annulled and image-based questions.Three LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini) were assessed.Each model answered all questions using a standardized prompt and provided a confidence score (0%-100%).Accuracy was recorded as correct/incorrect.Overconfidence was defined as incorrect responses with 90% confidence.Statistical analyses were performed using Cochran's Q test, Friedman test, and post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. Results:Accuracy rates were 89.4% for ChatGPT, 76.4% for Claude, and 90.2% for Gemini, with significant differences among models (c 2 (2) = 21.00,P < 0.001).Confidence scores differed significantly (c 2 (2) = 213.40,P < 0.001), with Gemini demonstrating highest confidence (99.51 ± 1.49), followed by ChatGPT (90.88 ± 9.19) and Claude (80.22 ± 11.10).Overconfidence rates were 9.8% for Gemini and 5.7% for ChatGPT, while no overconfident responses were observed for Claude (c 2 (2) = 14.53,P = 0.001).Despite similar accuracy between ChatGPT and Gemini, confidence patterns differed markedly, demonstrating that comparable accuracy does not necessarily reflect comparable reliability. Conclusions:LLMs demonstrated high accuracy in answering text-based endodontic examination questions; however, significant differences were observed in confidence behavior and overconfidence patterns.The presence of highconfidence incorrect responses suggests that accuracy alone may be insufficient to fully evaluate model reliability.These findings highlight the importance of considering confidence-related behavior alongside accuracy when assessing LLM performance in examination-style endodontic tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehmet Adıgüzel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: