Demonstrates improved accuracy in unsteady flow simulations, suggesting a viable alternative to existing methods.
In this work, we present details on the implementation of linear Rosenbrock-type methods and their application to unsteady flow problems. In recent years, especially in the field of high-order methods, diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta (DIRK) methods have gained popularity. However, linear Rosenbrock methods are an easier-to-implement and −to-use alternative. Their implementation requires little more than what is already commonly available in most flow solvers. We present results covering direct numerical simulation (DNS), large-eddy simulation (LES), and unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) applications and show that when combined with a second-order finite volume method, second-order Rosenbrock schemes provide sufficient accuracy. In particular, the two-stage second-order scheme (ROS2) shows simultaneously increased performance and accuracy compared to the popular second-order backward differentiation formula (BDF2). At the same time, it consistently outperforms similar DIRK schemes in our implementation. As an addition to a legacy finite volume (FV) solver, Rosenbrock methods can increase performance and accuracy and extend its range of applicability and lifespan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Löwe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: