Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced permeability in subsurface reservoirs using CO2 reactive fracturing, suggesting improved energy production and carbon storage.
Permeability enhancement in subsurface reservoirs is commonly achieved by hydraulic or CO 2 -based fracturing, yet the resulting benefits are often short-lived because fracture apertures progressively close as effective stress increases. This limitation constrains the long-term performance of geothermal, carbon storage, and other subsurface energy systems. Here, we introduce CO 2 reactive fracturing, a coupled hydraulic–chemical stimulation strategy that creates stress-resistant flow paths by integrating CO 2 -driven fracture initiation with localized chemical roughening of fracture surfaces. Using true-triaxial stress experiments on porous andesitic tuff, we show that viscosity-controlled water-assisted CO 2 fracturing alone predominantly generates tensile, mated fractures with limited aperture stability. In contrast, introducing a shear-thinning reactive assisting fluid composed of a chelating agent and a minor fluoride source confines flow to fractures and induces localized dissolution of aluminosilicate and Fe-bearing minerals. This process increases fracture-surface roughness while suppressing reactive-fluid infiltration into the surrounding matrix, thereby enhancing aperture retention and sustaining permeability under elevated effective stress. Our results establish a general mechanism by which fracture generation and chemically induced roughening act synergistically to produce durable permeability, with broad implications for subsurface energy production and carbon storage applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salalá et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: