Workshop and Delphi study refine the definition of sleep security, highlighting health equity implications.
Objectives Sleep is a fundamental biological process, yet environmental and social factors can influence sleep health. This study aimed to advance a human rights perspective on sleep by developing the emerging concept of sleep security. Methods An in-person workshop and online modified Delphi study were conducted (2024-2025) to refine/revise the definition and primary domains of sleep security. Participants were primarily Australian experts with clinical or academic experience in sleep, social determinants of health, health equity, and/or environmental health. Participants rated level of agreement with proposed definitions and domains of sleep security and provided qualitative feedback to justify their choices. Iterative rounds evaluated refined definitions if (a) <75% of participants indicated they "agree" or "strongly agree" and/or (b) content analysis of qualitative data indicated conceptual ambiguity or inconsistent interpretation. Results Thirty-one experts participated in Round 1, and 19 in Round 2. Although the overarching definition of sleep security and 4 of its proposed 5 domains reached the a priori agreement threshold in the first round, content analysis of qualitative feedback led to an alternative definition of sleep security and revised descriptions for 2 domains in Round 2. An overall definition of sleep security and its 5 primary domains ( Safety and security , conducive environment , policy and practice , opportunities and demands , and autonomy) was agreed upon. Conclusions A preliminary conceptualization of sleep security provides a framework for guiding research and advocacy efforts to improve social, environmental, and structural conditions that support sleep health. Further work is needed to test and refine this framework globally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schokman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: