Quantum-optical framework investigates light-matter coupling in nanocrystals for radiation detection, suggesting implications for enhanced emissions.
Nanoplasmonic modification of scintillation has so far been explored mainly in the weak-coupling regime, where changes in the local density of optical states enhance radiative recombination via Purcell-type rate engineering. By contrast, strong light-matter coupling generates hybrid states that modify emission dynamics beyond simple decay-rate acceleration, but its implications for scintillator nanocrystals (NCs) under ionizing radiation remain poorly understood. All of these effects are beneficial for near-infrared scintillators, which are typically slow and have low brightness. Here, we present a quantum-optical framework to investigate how near-infrared scintillator NCs coupled to nanoplasmonic antennas evolve from weak coupling toward strong light-matter coupling. We compare broad- and narrow-antenna platforms with single and periodic Au nanorods and benchmark them against conductive plasmonic antennas based on indium tin oxide and graphene. As representative emitters, we consider wide-band PbS NCs and narrow-band cubic Lu \(_2\) O \(_3\) :Er \(³⁺\) scintillators. The calculations show that the onset of strong-coupling signatures is jointly governed by emitter dephasing and the antenna linewidth, with narrow-band emitters coupled to spectrally narrow antennas providing the most favorable conditions. Among the platforms considered, graphene gives the lowest threshold owing to its ultranarrow antenna linewidth ( \(κ\) = 3.5 meV), with observable coherent-exchange signatures appearing at the lowest tested coupling strength of g = 8 meV. These results identify near-infrared conductive nanoantennas, particularly graphene-based ones, as promising platforms for accessing hybrid scintillation regimes relevant to radiation detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makowski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: