Key result
Moderate-to-severe frailty is linked to a ~58% higher postoperative complication burden versus mild frailty.
Why the study?
Evidence supporting the use of the Primary Care Frailty Index as a practical frailty assessment tool in gastrointestinal surgical oncology remains limited.
Does moderate-to-severe frailty (PC-FI ≥0.14) increase postoperative complications and length of stay compared to mild frailty in older patients undergoing major gastrointestinal oncologic surgery?
Cohort (n=92)
No
Does moderate-to-severe frailty (PC-FI ≥0.14) increase postoperative complications and length of stay compared to mild frailty in older patients undergoing major gastrointestinal oncologic surgery?
Higher Primary Care Frailty Index scores are associated with increased postoperative morbidity and prolonged recovery following major gastrointestinal oncologic surgery, though its discriminative performance as a stand-alone tool is modest.
May support PC-FI for preoperative risk stratification in GI oncologic surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background/Objectives: Frailty is increasingly recognized as a major determinant of postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing oncologic surgery. The Primary Care Frailty Index (PC-FI), a deficit accumulation-based instrument derived from routinely available clinical information, has recently been proposed as a practical frailty assessment tool. However, evidence supporting its application in gastrointestinal surgical oncology remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective major colorectal or gastric cancer surgery between January 2022 and October 2025 at a tertiary Italian hospital. Patients with a PC-FI > 0.07 were included and categorized as having mild (0.07–0.13) or moderate-to-severe frailty (≥0.14). Postoperative outcomes included the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), Clavien–Dindo classification, and length of hospital stay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the discriminative performance of PC-FI, ASA classification, and the ACS Surgical Risk Calculator. Results: Ninety-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with moderate-to-severe frailty were significantly older and had higher ASA class, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and ACS morbidity estimates than mildly frail patients. They also experienced a greater postoperative complication burden (mean CCI 25.96 vs. 16.40, p = 0.02) and longer hospital stay (9.89 vs. 7.43 days, p = 0.01). ROC analysis demonstrated modest discriminative performance for PC-FI (AUC 0.63), comparable to ASA classification (AUC 0.68) and the ACS morbidity score (AUC 0.70), without statistically significant differences among the three instruments. Conclusions: Higher PC-FI scores were associated with increased postoperative morbidity and prolonged recovery following major gastrointestinal oncologic surgery. Although its discriminative performance was modest and does not support its use as a stand-alone risk prediction tool, the PC-FI may represent a simple first-line frailty screening instrument to identify older patients who could benefit from comprehensive multidisciplinary perioperative assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costanzi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Gastrointestinal cancer (n=92). Moderate-to-severe frailty (PC-FI ≥0.14) vs. Mild frailty (PC-FI 0.07–0.13) was evaluated on Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) (p=0.02). Moderate-to-severe frailty (PC-FI ≥0.14) was associated with a greater postoperative complication burden compared to mild frailty (mean CCI 25.96 vs. 16.40, p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: