Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates antifouling and filtration efficiency of modified membranes, suggesting promising wastewater applications.
To enhance the filtration and antifouling properties of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) ultrafiltration membranes, a dual modification strategy was implemented. First, a poly(sodium p-styrene sulfonate) (PSS) polymer was synthesized via free-radical polymerization, and PSS/PVDF membrane with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN) structure was fabricated via a one-pot strategy combined with the non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) method. Subsequently, a polyaniline (PANI) layer was firmly anchored onto the PSS/PVDF membrane surface through two distinct surface polymerization approaches: adsorption followed by polymerization and synchronous polymerization. Under optimal preparation conditions, the resulting PANI-modified PSS/PVDF ultrafiltration membrane demonstrated a high flux of 401.03 L·m⁻²·h⁻¹, a bovine serum albumin (BSA) rejection rate of 99.02%, and an outstanding flux recovery rate (FRR) of 95.59%. Moreover, the PANI-modified PSS/PVDF ultrafiltration membrane exhibited significant antibiofouling efficacy, with inhibition rates against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus reaching 88.00% and 87.38%, respectively. Additionally, it achieved near-complete removal (99.99%) of both Congo Red (CR) and Methylene Blue (MB). These results indicate that the prepared PANI-modified PSS/PVDF ultrafiltration membrane with a semi-IPN structure holds significant potential for applications in the treatment of protein-containing and dye wastewater.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: