Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feasibility study shows remote tongue control improves activity performance in individuals with spinal injuries, suggesting potential for independence.
The objective of this feasibility study was to demonstrate and evaluate a remotely tongue-controlled wheelchair mounted assistive robotic manipulator (ARM), for the first time with end users: three individuals with cervical spinal cord injury. For three days, they remotely tongue-controlled the wheelchair and the ARM (WMARM) to complete two activities of daily living (ADL): Driving the wheelchair and ARM to a remote setting to (1) pick up a bottle and (2) pick up a ball. The participants controlled the system using full manual control by tongue and through semi-automation. Finally, the participants answered a NASA Task Load Index (TLX) questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. Results: All participants were able to remotely control the WMARM by tongue. Semi-automation resulted in shorter task completion time, gripping time and fewer commands as compared with manual control. Semi-automation decreased the measured mental load in the NASA TLX questionnaire by an average of 57%. The participants rated high satisfaction with the system. Conclusion: It was possible for the users with tetraplegia to control the wheelchair with the ARM using their tongue to perform ADL in Wi-Fi-based remote setting. This proposed system has the potential to increase independence and social interaction of individuals with tetraplegia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pálsdóttir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: