Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes trends and burden of eye-related emergency department visits in South Korea, suggesting resource allocation changes.
Purpose To analyze the diagnosis of eye-related emergency department (ED) visits in South Korea and to investigate the national burden of eye-related visits in the ED and their trends over time.Methods Data were obtained from the National Emergency Department Information System in South Korea between 2014 and 2022. A total of 74,714,270 ED visits were analyzed. Eye-related ED visits were identified using diagnosis codes at the time of discharge from ED. Temporal trends in annual ED visits were analyzed. Eye-related ED visits were categorized into three groups based on the emergent categories (emergent, unlikely-emergent, and indeterminate).Results During the 9-year study period, eye-related ED visits accounted for 1,356,169 (1.82%) visits. Total ED visits significantly decreased in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with a partial recovery by 2022 to 85% of 2019 levels. The number of eye-related ED visits similarly decreased in 2020, but it continued to decline until 2022, with its proportion dropping from 2.08% in 2014 to 1.58% in 2022 (rate: −0.0547%/year, 95% confidence interval: [−0.0723, −0.0371], p < 0.001). The SIR of total ED visits declined by 6.12% from 2014 to 2022. Among the eye-related ED visits, there were emergent (19.7%), unlikely-emergent (13.2%), and indeterminate (67.1%) cases.Conclusions Eye-related ED visits in South Korea decreased over the 9-year study period and the proportion of emergent cases increased. The steady decline in eye-related ED visits, along with an increase in emergent cases, may have implications for the allocation of ED resources in the field of ophthalmology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: