Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article analyzes the impact of the Russo-Ukrainian War on the European radical right's role in the international order, implying significant political implications.
This article explores the crisis of the liberal international order (LIO), situating it within the global struggle between two narrative alliances: liberal internationalism and reactionary internationalism. By examining the European radical right’s role as a potential Russian proxy and the LIO’s enemy from within, it demonstrates how the Russo-Ukrainian War has shaped rivalry over the international order and assesses whether this conflict has accelerated the disintegration of two internationalist coalitions or reinforced their cohesion. Furthermore, it employs a case study of the European Parliament’s voting behaviour on issues related to the Russo-Ukrainian War to empirically substantiate this analysis and demonstrate how attitudes towards this conflict vary across radical right groups and over time. The findings indicate that the Russo-Ukrainian War has underscored the resilience of the LIO while revealing internal divisions within the reactionary camp, particularly the European radical right. However, due to the ‘catch-all’ nature of reactionary internationalism, these divisions have not hindered the rise of the radical right or the development of a multi-order world. Lastly, the article highlights the complexity of the European radical right, its co-constitutive relationship with the LIO, and its role in mainstream politics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goran Tepšić (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: