Analytical study examines environmental justice in Madhya Pradesh, highlighting the role of the National Green Tribunal and regulatory challenges.
The growing conflict between environmental conservation and economic development has emerged as one of the most significant challenges in contemporary governance. Environmental degradation caused by industrialization, urbanization, mining activities, and excessive exploitation of natural resources has generated serious ecological concerns across India. Madhya Pradesh, known for its rich biodiversity, extensive forest cover, mineral wealth, and river systems, faces increasing environmental challenges arising from developmental activities. Environmental pollution has adversely affected air quality, water resources, public health, wildlife habitats, and ecological sustainability within the state. The constitutional vision of environmental protection has been strengthened through statutory legislation, judicial activism, and institutional mechanisms designed to promote environmental justice. Among these mechanisms, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has emerged as a specialized environmental adjudicatory body dedicated to addressing environmental disputes and enforcing environmental accountability. Through its application of principles such as sustainable development, precautionary action, and polluter responsibility, the Tribunal has significantly contributed to environmental governance in India. The present study critically examines environmental justice and pollution control in Madhya Pradesh with particular reference to the role of the National Green Tribunal and environmental regulatory institutions. The research analyses constitutional provisions, statutory environmental laws, institutional frameworks, judicial interventions, and environmental challenges affecting the state. The study further evaluates the effectiveness of environmental governance mechanisms and identifies major obstacles to implementation. It concludes that sustainable environmental management requires stronger regulatory enforcement, greater public participation, technological innovation, and integrated policy approaches aimed at balancing developmental objectives with ecological preservation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: