‘Substitute doctor’ – the claim that could be undermining vital work

Claire Read

doi:10.7748/ncyp.38.4.8.s6

July 2, 2026Nursing Children and Young People

‘Substitute doctor’ – the claim that could be undermining vital work

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The aim is to assess the validity of claims that advanced clinical practitioners are misutilized and how this affects nurse-doctor relations.
Literature review of existing claims regarding advanced clinical practitioners.
Qualitative analysis of interviews with healthcare professionals regarding roles and perceptions.
Discussion of workforce dynamics in the context of healthcare delivery.
Evidence suggests that claims of inappropriate use of advanced clinical practitioners are contested.
Nurse-doctor relations appear strained due to differing perceptions of clinical roles.
Recommendations highlight the need for improved collaboration and communication within healthcare teams.

Implication

This inquiry evaluates claims about advanced clinical practitioners' roles and their effects on nurse-doctor relationships, suggesting implications for collaboration.

Abstract

Is the accusation that advanced clinical practitioners are being used inappropriately justified, or is it just divisive for nurse-doctor relations?

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Claire Read (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a48a78b89561a0c2d78ede2 https://doi.org/10.7748/ncyp.38.4.8.s6

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

‘Substitute doctor’ – the claim that could be undermining vital work

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

‘Substitute doctor’ – the claim that could be undermining vital work

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

More related papers

More from Nursing Children and Young People

Keep reading

More related papers

More from Nursing Children and Young People