Key result
Genotype-specific features in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy demand tailored diagnosis, screening, and emerging targeted therapies.
Why the study?
ACM diagnostic criteria and risk prediction models are typically genotype-agnostic despite clinically meaningful genotype-phenotype associations that warrant genotype-specific diagnoses, risk stratification, and emerging targeted therapies.
This review emphasizes the transition toward genotype-specific diagnostic criteria, risk stratification, and targeted therapies (including AAV-mediated gene therapy) for the management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.
Supports genotype-informed screening and risk stratification in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; leaves open prospective validation of targeted therapies.
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a genetically heterogeneous inherited cardiomyopathy with an estimated prevalence of 1:5000-10 000 that predisposes patients to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). ACM diagnostic criteria and risk prediction models, particularly for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), the most common form of ACM, are typically genotype-agnostic, but numerous studies have established clinically meaningful genotype-phenotype associations. Early signs of ACM onset differ by genotype indicating the need for genotype-specific diagnostic criteria and family screening paradigms. Likewise, risk factors for SCD vary by genetic subtype, indicating that genotype-specific guidelines for management are also warranted. Of particular importance, genotype-specific therapeutic approaches are being developed. Results from a randomized controlled trial for flecainide use in ARVC patients are currently pending. Research in a plakophilin-2-deficient mouse model suggests this antiarrhythmic drug may be particularly useful for patients with likely pathogenic or pathogenic (LP/P) PKP2 variants. Additionally, the first gene therapy clinical trials in ARVC patients harboring LP/P PKP2 variants are currently underway. This review aims to provide clinicians caring for ACM patients with an up-to-date overview of the current literature in genotype-specific natural history of disease and management of ACM patients and describe scientific advances that have led to upcoming clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muller et al. (2024) conducted a review in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (ACM). Genotype-based diagnosis and management was evaluated. Genotype-specific differences in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy necessitate tailored diagnostic criteria, family screening, and management strategies, with emerging targeted therapies currently in clinical trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: