Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares treatment outcomes and joint damage in Sámi and non-Sámi patients, indicating disparities.
OBJECTIVES: To compare Sámi and non-Sámi patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and evaluate potential differences in treatment and joint damage. METHOD: A total of 424 adult PsA patients meeting the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria were recruited from the Norwegian Arthritis Registry and hospitals in northern Norway. A questionnaire from the SAMINOR (a study in regions with Sámi and Norwegian populations) was used to identify Sámi and non-Sámi patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics, joint damage, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment data were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression was used to adjust for age and gender differences. RESULTS: Sixty Sámi and 364 non-Sámi patients were identified, and the groups were comparable in demographic characteristics and disease activity measurements. Sámi patients experienced more joint damage than non-Sámi patients (42% vs 26%, p = 0.010), and the highest rate was observed among Sámi men (p = 0.005). Sámi patients also had a higher prevalence of arthritis and axial involvement (92% vs 76%, p = 0.007 vs 32% vs 20%, p = 0.033). In addition, Sámi men showed significant underutilization of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (83% vs 92%, p = 0.031), particularly methotrexate (68% vs 90%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Sámi PsA patients show higher rates of axial involvement, arthritis, and joint damage than their non-Sámi peers. Furthermore, Sámi patients demonstrate underutilization of csDMARDs. These findings underscore the importance of implementing culturally adapted healthcare strategies to improve treatment outcomes for Sámi patients with PsA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panagiotopoulos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: