Study simulates resilience outcomes in nickel supply chains, highlighting adaptive agent responses to policy shocks.
Nickel has become a strategic mineral for the energy transition, yet its supply chain is increasingly shaped by a compound risk regime involving resource nationalism, processing concentration, geopolitical compliance rules, carbon-footprint requirements, and commodity-market volatility. This study develops NiChain-LLM-ABM, a large-language-model-empowered agent-based model for simulating nickel supply chain resilience under semantically rich policy shocks. The framework uses a policy semantic parsing module to transform official policy texts into structured shock parameters, a multi-agent strategy generation module to represent adaptive decisions by seven agent classes, a calibrated supply chain network module to simulate material, financial, and information flows, and a four-dimensional resilience assessment module. The model is anchored in observed nickel production, price, trade, and technology data from USGS, IEA, UN Comtrade, LME, and official legal sources, and its scenario outputs are generated through 100 Monte Carlo replications over 2025–2035. Results show that the baseline Comprehensive Resilience Index (CRI) declines from 0.620 in 2025 to 0.547 in 2035. Indonesian policy tightening causes the sharpest near-term deterioration, with CRI falling to 0.445 in 2028 and the simulated supply deficit reaching 24.5 kt Ni equivalent. A geopolitical compliance shock produces the lowest terminal resilience (CRI = 0.472 in 2035). A green-compliance scenario is disruptive in the short run but exceeds the baseline by 2035, while a coordinated policy portfolio raises the terminal CRI to 0.744, a 36.0% improvement over the baseline. Compared with a conventional rule-based ABM, the LLM-ABM reduces extreme-event backcasting error by 57%, improves policy-response fidelity by 53%, and more than doubles agent heterogeneity differentiation. The results support portfolio-based critical-mineral governance combining strategic reserves, overseas equity investment, recycling, technology substitution, and international cooperation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yong Jiang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: