Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical analysis reveals limited integration of decolonisation in Bangladeshi English textbooks, implying a need for reform.
This paper provides a critical review of the English language textbook English for Today (EfT) (2022), taught in higher secondary education within Bangladesh, in relation to the decolonisation framework of World Englishes (WEs) and the concept of ‘colonialingualism’. The content analysis reveals that the ethos of WEs is minimally reflected across various linguistic features. While EfT incorporates ornamental expressions and employs Bangla words in italics to suggest local ownership of English and its relevance to local contexts, it simultaneously depicts the West as an idealised utopia, contrasting it with Bangladesh, which is beset by poverty, natural disasters, corruption, and traditional, conservative lifestyles. The textbook activities seem limited in fostering critical engagement. Moreover, the influence of colonialingualism appears to overshadow efforts aimed at decolonising WEs. The paper concludes that WEs will become more significant both critically and pedagogically if the content and activities are selected with a decolonisation perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaila Sultana (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: