Delphi study develops recommendations for indicators and strategies to enhance detection of acute deterioration in long-term care, indicating a need for effective implementation.
Aim This study aimed to develop recommendations for acceptable physical and psychological clinical indicators of acute deterioration and strategies to support sustained adoption of an approach to detecting and responding to acute deterioration in long‐term care. Background Previous studies have trialled programmes to reduce avoidable hospital transfers through early detection of acute deterioration in long‐term care. However, variability in outcomes and implementation experiences highlights differences in the essential components of these approaches. Design Three‐round Delphi process. Methods The Delphi process conducted between September 2022 and January 2023 included a 22‐member Australian expert panel to elicit consensus and to generate recommendations. Delphi participants were asked to rate the potential items on a 9‐point scale for level of importance (Part A), level of priority of action (Part B) and level of acceptability (Part C). The mean, standard deviation (SD) and I‐CVI of each item were calculated. Clinical indicators with mean ≥ 7, I‐CVI ≥ 0.78 were considered to have a good degree of agreement, appropriateness and relevance and were deemed acceptable for inclusion. Results Participants completed a two‐part online survey in Round 1, and three‐part surveys in Rounds 2 and 3. Round 1, Part A included 44 clinical indicators. On completion of Round 3, 36 items remained. Care pathways in response to acute deterioration ( n = 20) were included in Part B. After Round 3, 17 care pathways remained. There was agreement in Part C that communication aides, education and mentor programmes were necessary as viable strategies to support sustained adoption. Conclusion Detecting the early warning signs of acute deterioration will have significant outcomes for residents, staff and health care services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: