Purpose This study proposes a deep learning-based decision support system for stress induction management in tangerine cultivation. While current techniques depend heavily on subjective visual information, we offer an objective, data-driven mechanism to determine whether a branch is likely to respond favorably to stress induction. Design/methodology/approach Leaf images were used as input, as color reflects photosynthetic pigment composition linked to readiness for stress-induced flowering. A dataset of 516 images, acquired under controlled conditions, was used to train the model. The system predicts flowering success into three categories: low, moderate and high. Four convolutional neural networks architectures (VGG16, ResNet50, MobileNet and Inception) were evaluated using Adam and Adamax with 10-fold cross-validation. Beyond standard transfer learning, the modeling pipeline integrates task-specific fine-tuning and red-, green- and blue-based colorimetric interpretation. Performance analysis includes receiver operating characteristic and gradient-weighted class activation mapping, with metrics summarized using accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score. Model selection was based on class-wise robustness and model size. Findings We found that architectural choice strongly affects predictive performance. The inception provides the highest accuracy-efficiency ratio (accuracy = 0.90, F1-Score = 0.89, precision = 0.92, recall = 0.88 and model size = 57 Megabytes), beating larger models and being lightweight enough for mobile application. The trained models were implemented into a mobile application prototype for real-time inference. The low flowering-success category remains difficult to detect due to its high intra-class variability. Originality/value This decision support system provides a practical approach to use an artificial intelligence-driven flowering analysis straight in stress induction workflows for more accurate and efficient cultivation management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prilianti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: