Examines supervisory monitoring of autonomous mobile units in outdoor industrial sites, indicating effective performance.
Outdoor industrial sites, including logistics terminals, construction yards, and civil infrastructure worksites, increasingly require supervisory systems for monitoring autonomous mobile units under variable wireless and operational conditions. This study presents an edge-cloud telemetry platform that connects V2X on-board and roadside units to a normalized data pipeline and an operator dashboard. The architecture assigns frame reception and data validation to the edge layer, while cloud services perform stream ingestion, storage, querying, and visualization using a Kafka-Elasticsearch-Grafana stack. A fixed supervisory schema was defined for position, heading, speed, mission state, battery level, and error flags so that virtual fields used in early validation can later be replaced by measured signals without changing downstream interfaces. Physical field validation was conducted using a single test vehicle in a construction-site emulation environment to evaluate communication continuity and dashboard refresh behavior. Multi-unit applicability was examined at the architecture and schema levels, and a preliminary payload-level capacity estimate was derived using the telemetry frequency and payload-length assumptions. Under the tested site conditions, the system maintained continuous reception and visualization over an approximately 700 m distance from the RSU-side reference location. The measured end-to-end display delay averaged 0.78 s, with a standard deviation of 0.059 s and a maximum of 0.96 s. Under a 10 Hz status-message condition, the estimated pure-payload traffic was approximately 23 kbps per mobile unit. These results indicate that V2X-based edge-cloud telemetry can provide a practical baseline for supervisory monitoring in outdoor industrial sites, while simultaneous multi-vehicle validation, detailed network-load evaluation, and long-term field testing remain necessary future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: