Key result
Atrial leadless pacemaker shortens QTc and completely suppresses S-ICD therapies in an LQTS patient.
Why the study?
Beta-blockers are first-line therapy for congenital LQTS, but intolerance due to bradycardia may occur in patients requiring pacing.
Does an atrial leadless pacemaker combined with an S-ICD improve symptoms and suppress ICD therapies in a patient with LQTS and beta-blocker intolerance?
Case Report (n=1)
Does an atrial leadless pacemaker combined with an S-ICD improve symptoms and suppress ICD therapies in a patient with LQTS and beta-blocker intolerance?
Combining an atrial leadless pacemaker with an S-ICD may be a feasible and effective strategy for selected LQTS patients requiring atrial pacing due to beta-blocker intolerance.
Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) is associated with ventricular arrhythmias and increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Beta-blockers are first-line therapy, although intolerance may occur. We report a case of a 50-year-old man with LQTS and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) who experienced recurrent appropriate therapies and beta-blocker intolerance due to bradycardia. An atrial leadless pacemaker was implanted while maintaining the S-ICD, achieving a double-device strategy without intracardiac leads. This approach resulted in QTc shortening, symptom improvement, and complete suppression of further ICD therapies. This strategy may represent a feasible and effective alternative in selected LQTS patients requiring atrial pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pérez-Díez et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) (n=1). Atrial leadless pacemaker implantation was evaluated on QTc shortening, symptom improvement, and suppression of ICD therapies. Implantation of an atrial leadless pacemaker in a patient with an S-ICD and LQTS resulted in QTc shortening, symptom improvement, and complete suppression of further ICD therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: