Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced 3D generation quality and editability using Tempo3D, implying improved geometric precision.
Despite recent advancements in native latent diffusion models for single-view 3D generation, they still suffer from inadequate geometric details due to the global entanglement of VecSet-based representations and inaccurate structural topology arising from single-view ambiguity. Existing solutions often rely on model scaling over large-scale datasets to improve fidelity, which is computationally prohibitive and inefficient in capturing fine-grained details. In this work, we propose Tempo3D , a resource-efficient paradigm for high-fidelity VecSet-based 3D generation via efficient temporal-aware fine-tuning and multi-view latent aggregation. Our approach consists of two critical components: (1) To facilitate robust detail learning, we establish the TempoDetail dataset and design the Time-Segmented LoRA (TS-LoRA) module. TS-LoRA exploits the inherent "structure-to-details" temporal transition of flow-based models to decouple feature learning, significantly bolstering the capacity to produce high-frequency details without large-scale retraining. (2) To mitigate geometric inaccuracies stemming from single-view ambiguity, we propose a multi-view latent aggregation strategy incorporating Soft Flow Trajectory Projection (Soft FTP) and Score-based Velocity Field Aggregation (SVFA). By aggregating reference views derived from Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), these components resolve the intrinsic conflicts between velocity vectors caused by cross-view latent discrepancies, thereby preventing geometric collapse and ensuring directional consistency. Moreover, the integration of MLLMs empowers Tempo3D to support precise semantic 3D editing via natural language prompts while maintaining structural integrity. Experiments demonstrate that Tempo3D outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in generation quality, geometric precision, and editability under a highly efficient computational budget.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: