Each 1-unit increase in baseline red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio was associated with a 19% higher risk of incident depression in older adults (HR 1.19).
Cohort (n=6,151)
Does higher baseline RAR predict incident depression and worsening depressive symptom trajectories in older adults?
Higher baseline RAR is longitudinally associated with an increased risk of incident depression and worsening depressive symptoms in older adults.
Hazard Ratio: 1.19 (95% CI 1.06–1.33)
p-value: p=0.004
The ratio of red blood cell distribution width to albumin (RAR) is a systemic blood-based marker associated with adverse health outcomes. Although cross-sectional studies have suggested a link between RAR and depression, its longitudinal association with the incidence and long-term course of late-life depression has not yet been established. We aimed to address this knowledge gap using data from a large cohort of older adults. This longitudinal cohort study used data from the Health and Retirement Study (2016–2022). The analysis of incident depression included 6,151 U.S. adults aged ≥ 60 years who were free of depression at baseline. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the association, and restricted cubic splines were applied to examine the dose-response relationship. In a subcohort of 5,588 participants, group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify depressive symptom trajectories, and their association with baseline RAR was examined using multinomial logistic regression. During a median follow-up of 6 years, 1,287 participants developed incident depression. In the fully adjusted model, each 1-unit increase in baseline RAR was associated with a 19% higher risk of incident depression (HR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06–1.33). Compared with the lowest quartile, the highest RAR quartile was associated with a higher risk of incident depression (HR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01–1.42). The dose-response analysis indicated a linear relationship (P for non-linearity = 0.961). Four distinct symptom trajectories were identified: “Non-depressed” (28.11%), “Low-stable” (40.89%), “Moderate-progressive” (25.42%), and “High-progressive” (5.58%). Compared with the “Non-depressed” group, higher baseline RAR was associated with greater odds of membership in the “High-progressive” (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11–1.55) and “Moderate-progressive” (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.07–1.73) groups. In this large, nationally representative cohort of older adults, higher baseline RAR was longitudinally associated with an increased risk of incident depression and a subsequent long-term trajectory of worsening depressive symptoms.
Jiang et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Incident depression (n=6,151). Red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio (RAR) vs. Lower RAR was evaluated on Incident depression (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.33, p=0.004). Each 1-unit increase in baseline red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio was associated with a 19% higher risk of incident depression in older adults (HR 1.19).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: