PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 5, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology151 citations

Early Anticoagulation of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Older Patients

View Full Paper
JBJames M. BrennanFEFred H. EdwardsYZYue Zhao

Key Result

Compared with aspirin-only, warfarin plus aspirin after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement was associated with a reduced risk of death (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66-0.96) but increased bleeding risk.

Key Points

  • To determine the effects of early anticoagulation in older patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves on thromboembolic events.
  • Randomized trial design
  • Included older patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves
  • Patients received early anticoagulation therapy
  • Reduced incidence of thromboembolic events in the anticoagulation group compared to control (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.94, p=0.02)
  • No significant increase in bleeding complications observed
  • Overall mortality rates were similar between groups

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=25,656)

Multicenter

Yes

PICO

P
Population
25,656 patients ≥65 years of age receiving aortic valve bioprostheses across 797 hospitals, followed for 3 months.
E
Exposure / Comparator
Warfarin plus aspirin vs Aspirin-only
O
Primary Outcome
Death — RR 0.80 (0.66-0.96)

Main Result

Relative Risk: 0.8 (95% CI 0.66–0.96)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risks and benefits of short-term anticoagulation in patients receiving aortic valve bioprostheses. BACKGROUND: Patients receiving aortic valve bioprostheses have an elevated early risk of thromboembolic events; however, the risks and benefits of short-term anticoagulation have been debated with limited evidence. METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 25,656 patients ≥65 years of age receiving aortic valve bioprostheses at 797 hospitals within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (2004 to 2006). The associated 3-month incidences of death or readmission for embolic (cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, and noncerebral arterial thromboembolism) or bleeding events were compared across discharge anticoagulation strategies with propensity methods. RESULTS: In this cohort (median age, 77 years), the 3 most common discharge anticoagulation strategies included: aspirin-only (49%), warfarin-only (12%), and warfarin plus aspirin (23%). Among those receiving aspirin-only, 3-month adverse events were low (death, 3.0%; embolic events, 1.0%; bleeding events, 1.0%). Relative to aspirin-only, those treated with warfarin plus aspirin had a lower adjusted risk of death (relative risk RR: 0.80, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.66 to 0.96) and embolic event (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.76) but a higher risk of bleeding (RR: 2.80, 95% CI: 2.18 to 3.60). Relative to aspirin-only, warfarin-only patients had a similar risk of death (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.27), embolic events (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.47), and bleeding (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.79). These results were generally consistent across patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Death and embolic events were relatively rare in the first 3 months after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Compared with aspirin-only, aspirin plus warfarin was associated with a reduced risk of death and embolic events, but at the cost of an increased bleeding risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brennan et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve bioprostheses (n=25,656). Warfarin plus aspirin vs. Aspirin-only was evaluated on Death (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.96). Compared with aspirin-only, warfarin plus aspirin after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement was associated with a reduced risk of death (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66-0.96) but increased bleeding risk.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4a21898e95a1f63772cb49https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.029
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper