Cross-sectional study examines walking behaviors in relation to walkability index in 95 cities, suggesting environmental strategies for physical activity.
We examined dose–response relations between a Japan Postcode-level Walkability Index (JPWI) and total walking, walking for leisure; and walking for transport, among adults living in 95 cities across the country. This nationwide cross-sectional study included 40,286 adults (males 50.5%, 49.4 ± 15.6 years) residing in a wide range of urban and rural settings, who responded to a web-based survey conducted in 2021 using quota sampling. The JPWI was calculated by generating a 1000 m road network buffer from a representative point within each postcode boundary using the mean of z-scores summarizing the population density, intersection density and number of destinations within this buffer. JPWI scores ranged from −1.848 to 2.590. There was a non-linear positive association between JPWI and total walking, with an inflection point at a JPWI of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.87), below which the association with walking time was minimal (B = 22 [11,32]), but above which walking time increased significantly (B = 118 [106, 129]). Similar patterns of associations were observed in both leisure walking and walking for transport, with inflection points at JPWI values of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.86) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.86), respectively. Findings highlight the potential utility of considering how the JPWI (and potentially related measures for other countries) of local areas compare with such empirically-identified inflection points when developing strategies for improving the built environment to promote physical activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amagasa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: