Randomized trial interprets cultural motifs in clay figurines, indicating their significance for heritage conservation.
Decorative motifs on the Huaiyang Nini Dog clay figurines, produced for the Taihao Ling Temple Fair, constitute a rich visual symbol system encoding deep cultural meanings, yet systematic analysis of these motifs as an autonomous symbolic unit distinct from figurine-form typology remains absent. This study integrates Panofsky’s three-stage iconological theory with Peirce’s icon/index/symbol classification and Barthes’ denotation/connotation/myth model to interpret eight core motif types: human-face, frog, concentric circle, serpent, sun/radial, fertility, beast-face, and composite. The motifs share a visual grammar of four basic line types on a black-ground five-colour system, and encode four symbolic themes: ancestor worship, fertility worship, life cycle and cosmology, and totemic interpenetration, tracing a progression from icon to symbol along Peirce’s continuum. Crucially, the motifs have not disappeared under commercialisation but have undergone hierarchical functional shift from ritual-functional to aesthetic-commercial marking, a mechanism characterised by form persistence with meaning migration. The dual iconological–semiotic framework offers a replicable model for folk-craft motif studies, and the findings ground intangible-heritage conservation strategies that prioritise cultural encoding over figurine-form replication, with implications for heritage education, curatorial documentation, creative-industry development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: