Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial compares immunogenicity and safety of S-268024 booster in vaccinated adults, indicating promising outcomes.
BACKGROUND: S-268024 is a recombinant protein vaccine developed as a COVID-19 booster. METHODS: This randomized, observer-blind, phase 3 study enrolled previously vaccinated Japanese adults without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The noninferiority of the immunogenicity of the S-268024 booster vaccination versus NVX-CoV2373 was assessed. RESULTS: The immunogenicity population included 733 (S-268024 group: n = 368; NVX-CoV2373 group: n = 365) of 734 randomized participants. The geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 1.79 (1.52-2.12), and the difference in seroresponse rate (95% CI) of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody was 7.9% (1.3%-14.4%) on day 29. The lower limit of 95% CI exceeded prespecified margins, indicating noninferior immunogenicity of S-268024 versus NVX-CoV2373; superiority in GMT was also demonstrated. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were numerically higher with S-268024 (92.4%) than NVX-CoV2373 (77.5%), with no treatment-related deaths/serious AEs/AEs of special interest. CONCLUSIONS: Interim analyses established noninferiority and superiority of S-268024 to NVX-CoV2373 in immunogenicity, with an acceptable safety profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: