Retrospective cohort study shows thalidomide improves hemoglobin and decreases transfusion needs in TDT, suggesting a viable rescue option.
BACKGROUND: A proportion of transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) patients show suboptimal or heterogeneous response to luspatercept. We explored a structured rescue approach by adding low- to moderate-dose thalidomide after predefined luspatercept failure in real-world practice. METHODS: This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Adults with TDT on luspatercept who met predefined criteria for suboptimal response (failure to achieve ≥ 33% reduction in RBC units over a 12-week window versus each patient's baseline 12-week window, or failure to increase Hb by ≥ 1.0 g/dL under an unchanged transfusion trigger) received thalidomide 25-50 mg once daily while continuing luspatercept. Primary endpoint was 12-week transfusion independence (TI), defined as no transfusion for 12 consecutive weeks and Hb ≥ 9.0 g/dL. Secondary endpoints included ≥ 33%/≥50% reductions in RBC units over matched 12-week windows, longitudinal Hb change, and safety graded by CTCAE v5.0 and reported as exposure-adjusted incidence rates. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included (median age 23 years; female 45.5%; β⁰/β⁰ 18.2%; prior splenectomy 63.6%). Twelve-week transfusion independence (TI) was achieved in 4/11 patients (36.4%; 95% CI 15.2-64.6). Proportions with ≥ 33% and ≥ 50% reductions in RBC units over matched 12-week windows were 45.5% (95% CI 21.3-72.0) and 45.5% (95% CI 21.3-72.0), respectively. Hemoglobin increased by 4.0 g/dL (Hodges-Lehmann, 95% CI 2.9-5.0; LMM p < 0.001). Total exposure was 112 patient-months; EAIR for any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events was 8.0 per 100 patient-months. No ≥Grade 2 neurotoxicity or thrombosis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In TDT patients with predefined luspatercept failure, adding low- to moderate-dose thalidomide was associated with improvements in hemoglobin levels and reductions in transfusion burden with favorable tolerability. These findings warrant prospective validation of this structured rescue approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nanthachak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: