This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Marek-Lars Kruusen’s Quantum Gravity and the Creation of Wormholes (2024), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Kruusen’s interpretation of quantum gravity, his rejection of gravitons, his use of the Planck length as a physical limit of spacetime, and his hypothesis that electromagnetic field variations at the speed of light could generate transient trapped surfaces or artificial wormholes. From the perspective of TO, the article identifies relevant points of dialogue concerning surface, boundary, limit, radiation, information, gravitational convergence, and the rejection of physical singularities. At the same time, it highlights important modal and methodological tensions, especially the transition from electromagnetic propagation to infinite spacetime curvature, the technological claim of wormhole creation, and the need for stronger empirical and tensorial mediation. The analysis argues that Kruusen’s proposal should not be treated as direct confirmation of TO, but as a fertile speculative interlocutor. Its main value lies in offering conceptual images of secondary boundaries, radiation-information, toroidal configurations, and inductive transitions within an already constituted universe. The study concludes by proposing a TO-style reconstruction of the hypothesis, interpreting electromagnetic surfaces not as proven wormholes, but as possible phenomenic expressions of radiation-information and Inductive Effects. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Marek-Lars Kruusen; Quantum Gravity; Wormholes; Radiation-Information; Modal Discipline; Planck Length; Schwarzschild Surface; Trapped Surfaces; Inductive Effects; Gravitational Convergence; Cosmology; Philosophy of Physics; Critical-Propositional Analysis; AI-Assisted Analysis.
Cabannas et al. (Sat,) studied this question.