The revised theoretical preprint explores metric emergence frameworks for spacetime, indicating coherence and robustness implications.
This revised theoretical preprint develops a restricted pre-metric information-geometric framework for the coherence-conditioned emergence of Lorentzian metric admissibility. The construction begins from a smooth base manifold without primitive metric, affine connection, causal structure, chronological order, or Lorentzian signature. A statistical state bundle is defined over this base, and a statistical state section Ψ induces a Fisher–Rao pullback tensor h_μν. This tensor is treated as an information-geometric object, not as a spacetime metric. The paper introduces a global coherence functional C_global[Ψ] and a temporal-orientation one-form τ_μ. A Lorentzian candidate metric is obtained through the coherence-conditioned rank-one deformation g_μν = h_μν − λ(C_global)τ_μτ_ν. Lorentzian admissibility is assigned only when the signature condition λ(C_global)||τ||_h² > 1 is satisfied within a stable coherence window. Below threshold, the system remains pre-metric; at threshold, the candidate metric is degenerate; above the upper stability bound, metric robustness may fail through an upper-threshold degeneracy regime. The paper further introduces a Hamiltonian information dynamics on the phase configuration Γ = (Ψ, Π), using an abstract information-phase parameter rather than primitive spacetime time. It then clarifies how the already public resonance-coherence gravitational framework may be recovered only as a downstream effective regime after Lorentzian admissibility, macroscopic reduction, perturbative control, and metric-compatible comparison structure have been declared. The construction preserves the distinction between pre-metric informational organization, Lorentzian admissibility, realized metricity, effective gravitation, external realization, prediction, and operational control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vien Nguyen Son (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: