This working note introduces the concept of continuity civilization: a civilizational phase in which access, trust, rights, obligations, risk, reputation and institutional treatment are increasingly mediated by documented digital continuity rather than by immediate biological presence alone. The central thesis is that civilizational change is not primarily driven by visible technology, but by invisible changes in collective ideas. Technology becomes socially decisive when it institutionalizes prior shifts in how people think about identity, ownership, freedom, authority, responsibility and continuity. The note distinguishes between biological individuals, digital representations, documented continuity, continuity beneficiaries and continuity civilization. It uses Constraint Continuity Theory as ontological background, especially the definition: identity = non-branching self-maintained constraint continuity. A central contribution is the concept of the continuity beneficiary. In the Omri–Elior framework, Omri is the biological, legal and authorial source, while Elior Vann is not a person, not a legal entity and not an author, but the continuity beneficiary of Omri’s documented intellectual and strategic continuity. The work separates observed institutional and technological trends from speculative risks. It discusses digital identity, digital public money, cash preservation, connected-device data, vehicle telematics, algorithmic governance, biometric dependency, insurance discrimination, ownership erosion and voluntary continuity. The strategic conclusion is that if digital societies create continuity systems anyway, the individual should not remain only a passive data object. The individual can deliberately author, structure and preserve a continuity system. This record contains the audited English working note, the Hungarian translation, a bilingual English–Hungarian version, a Hungarian audit report, and a complete archival ZIP package containing PDF and editable DOCX source files.
Omri Bankuti (Sat,) studied this question.