Patients frequently cannot understand their own clinical documents, a health-literacy gap associated with poorer outcomes. Large language models (LLMs) can rewrite clinical text into plain language, but their fluency masks a safety-critical weakness: they can silently alter clinically material facts. We present MedPlain, an open-source system that simplifies clinical text at a selectable reading level, in English and Arabic, entirely on the user's device, and pairs each simplification with a two-layer faithfulness check (a deterministic dose/number verifier and an LLM semantic verifier). MedPlain further ingests printed prescriptions from PDF or image and applies an OCR confidence gate that refuses low-confidence reads to prevent an OCR-to-hallucination failure mode. We evaluate the system on a gold-standard set of five prescriptions spanning oncology, cardiology, and general practice, with documented "known facts" and "known traps." Readability improved from a mean Flesch-Kincaid grade of 21.5 to 7.4 and 95% of numeric facts were preserved. However, the semantic verifier detected only 1 of 24 subtle meaning-level distortions, and on a handwritten document the pipeline produced a fluent but fabricated prescription. We report these negative results transparently: numeric fidelity and fluency create false confidence, and robust semantic faithfulness for medical simplification remains unsolved. MedPlain is positioned as a research and educational prototype - not a medical device - and its design centers on privacy, honest safety framing, and mandatory human review. Code and data are openly available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awais Ur Rehman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: