Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental validation of a motion correction technique for 3D scanning of moving objects, indicating enhanced accuracy.
Conventional laser scanning techniques (such as in a Terrestrial Laser Scanner or Mobile mapping), whether used in a static or mobile mode require the object of interest to remain stationary during the scanning stage. Any motion of the object during scanning results in the apparent distortions in the resulting point cloud. The authors in (Goel and Lohani, 2014b) proposed a motion correction technique to estimate the 3D geometry of a moving object, utilizing a fusion of inertial and GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) sensors and transformation of the resulting point cloud to an object body coordinate system (OBCS). This paper aims to carry out the experimental validation and performance analysis of the motion correction method. Field experiments are designed and conducted in three phases to verify the correctness of the method. Through this, the paper aims to uncover insights into the performance of the motion correction algorithm and provide the first experimental validation of the proposed technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: