The framework analyzes risk in artificial intelligence across economic sectors, highlighting implications.
Every mature economic input is governed by a corresponding risk model. Financial instruments are assessed through Value at Risk, sensitivity measures, and stress testing; physical commodities through supply-chain models, futures curves, and storage-decay functions. Artificial intelligence, a synthetic cognitive input introduced into human decision systems, is at present deployed at scale without any equivalent risk vocabulary. This paper presents a structural overview of SIRA (Synthetic Intelligence Risk Assessment), a framework for pricing artificial intelligence as a risk-bearing economic input. The overview is organised around five components required for applied use of the framework: (i) the purpose SIRA serves and the measurement gap it addresses; (ii) the seven-layer risk stack on which it is founded; (iii) the Medha rating system, which compresses measured risk into a comparable letter grade; (iv) three operating levels that classify the mode of the human-AI relationship; and (v) the manner in which the risk profile varies across economic sectors. The framework's central proposition turns on two multipliers of identical magnitude: the one whose conditions remain unexamined is a liability, and the one whose conditions have been priced is an asset. The output is identical in both cases; the difference lies in whether the risks beneath it have been made explicit, and measuring that difference is the framework's purpose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shreya Bhattacharya (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: