Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unified evaluation reveals advantages of SfM-MVS over 3D Gaussian Splatting in accuracy of reconstruction.
Large-scale 3D reconstruction has emerged as a key research in the fields of photogrammetry and computer vision. 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has become a mainstream approach due to its efficient rendering, but it confronts critical challenges in large-scale scenarios: excessive memory overhead and inadequate geometric accuracy. Meanwhile, the traditional Structure from Motion and Multi-view Stereo (SfM-MVS) framework, despite its cumbersome process, continues to exhibit robust performance. Notably, a systematic evaluation comparing these two paradigms in large-scale scenes remains absent. To address this, we develop a unified verification framework to evaluate the texture rendering quality and geometric reconstruction precision of several recent methods using real-world datasets. The results indicate that SfM-MVS methods still maintain an advantage in the completeness and accuracy of geometric reconstruction. In contrast, 3DGS methods have achieved breakthroughs in local accuracy or rendering-geometry synergy, yet their global consistency requires further improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: