Key result
Greater preablation left atrial scar quantified by an automated method was associated with postablation AF recurrence (6.6% vs 3.5%; P=0.032) and correlated with lower endocardial voltage.
Why the study?
Does automated quantification of atrial scar by LGE CMR correlate with endocardial voltage and predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=50)
Yes
Does automated quantification of atrial scar by LGE CMR correlate with endocardial voltage and predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.6% vs 3.5%
p-value: p=0.032
An automated, objective method for quantifying left atrial scar using LGE CMR correlates with endocardial voltage and identifies patients at higher risk for atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation.
May facilitate reproducible atrial scar assessment in AF; leaves open prospective validation before guiding ablation.
BACKGROUND: For late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of atrial scar to guide management and targeting of ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF), an objective, reproducible method of identifying atrial scar is required. OBJECTIVE: To describe an automated method for operator-independent quantification of LGE that correlates with colocated endocardial voltage and clinical outcomes. METHODS: LGE CMR imaging was performed at 2 centers, before and 3 months after pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal AF (n = 50). A left atrial (LA) surface scar map was constructed by using automated software, expressing intensity as multiples of standard deviation (SD) above blood pool mean. Twenty-one patients underwent endocardial voltage mapping at the time of pulmonary vein isolation (11 were redo procedures). Scar maps and voltage maps were spatially registered to the same magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) segmentation. RESULTS: The LGE levels of 3, 4, and 5SDs above blood pool mean were associated with progressively lower bipolar voltages compared to the preceding enhancement level (0.85 ± 0.33, 0.50 ± 0.22, and 0.38 ± 0.28 mV; P = .002, P < .001, and P = .048, respectively). The proportion of atrial surface area classified as scar (ie, >3 SD above blood pool mean) on preablation scans was greater in patients with postablation AF recurrence than those without recurrence (6.6% ± 6.7% vs 3.5% ± 3.0%, P = .032). The LA volume >102 mL was associated with a significantly greater proportion of LA scar (6.4% ± 5.9% vs 3.4% ± 2.2%; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: LA scar quantified automatically by a simple objective method correlates with colocated endocardial voltage. Greater preablation scar is associated with LA dilatation and AF recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malcolme‐Lawes et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=50). Preablation left atrial scar quantified by automated LGE CMR vs. Patients without AF recurrence was evaluated on Proportion of atrial surface area classified as scar in patients with vs without postablation AF recurrence (p=0.032). Greater preablation left atrial scar quantified by an automated method was associated with postablation AF recurrence (6.6% vs 3.5%; P=0.032) and correlated with lower endocardial voltage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: