Key result
Lowest Child Opportunity Index linked to ~150% higher prevalence of >60-minute pediatric ECMO drive times.
Why the study?
Unequal geographic distribution of neighborhood resources and healthcare services can exacerbate disparities in access to care, prompting evaluation of geospatial access to pediatric ECMO in the U.S.
Does neighborhood-level social advantage, racial/ethnic composition, and urbanicity affect geospatial access to pediatric ECMO services in the U.S.?
Cross-Sectional
Does neighborhood-level social advantage, racial/ethnic composition, and urbanicity affect geospatial access to pediatric ECMO services in the U.S.?
Children in under-resourced and rural U.S. neighborhoods face significantly longer drive times to pediatric ECMO services, highlighting geographic disparities in access to critical care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Disparities in pediatric ECMO access by neighborhood opportunity merit monitoring; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve equity.
Unequal geographic distribution of neighborhood resources and healthcare services can exacerbate disparities in access to care. In this study, we evaluate geospatial access to pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) services in the U.S., examining differences by neighborhood-level social advantage, racial/ethnic composition, and urbanicity versus rurality. We conducted a cross-sectional geospatial analysis to define catchment areas based on 0–30, 31–60, 61–120 and > 120-minute drive-times from pediatric ECMO centers. For each catchment, we calculated mean values for key neighborhood characteristics: the Child Opportunity Index (COI), percent underrepresented races/ethnicities (%UR), and urban versus rural classification. We compared means across drive-time zones, and prevalence ratios (PR) for residing > 60-minute from ECMO centers. PR based on dichotomized COI, %UR, and rurality calculate the prevalence of > 60-minute drive-times for low COI/%UR verses high, and for rural versus urban areas. Overall, 30.5% of children reside > 60-minutes from pediatric ECMO services with 9.7% residing > 120-minutes away. Areas > 60-minutes from ECMO had lower COI compared with those close (difference in mean COI: 7.0 (95%CI 5.1, 8.3). The prevalence of > 60-minute drive-times was 150% higher for the lowest vs. highest COI quintile areas (PR: 2.5 [1.8, 3.4]). In contrast, areas located < 60-minutes from ECMO services had 8.6% higher %UR. Prevalence of > 60-minute drive-times was 200% higher in rural versus urban catchments (PR: 3.1 [2.7, 3.5]). In conclusion, children living further from pediatric ECMO services tend to have fewer neighborhood resources and are more likely to reside in rural areas, underscoring the need for targeted approaches to promote equitable access to healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moynihan et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Pediatric ECMO access. Lowest Child Opportunity Index (COI) quintile vs. Highest Child Opportunity Index (COI) quintile was evaluated on Prevalence of > 60-minute drive-times to pediatric ECMO services (PR 2.5, 95% CI 1.8-3.4, p=<0.001). Children residing in the lowest Child Opportunity Index quintile areas had a 150% higher prevalence of living >60 minutes from pediatric ECMO services compared to those in the highest quintile (PR 2.5).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: